{"id":"W2739605467","doi":"10.1080/14789949.2017.1358758","title":"Justice at risk! An evaluation of a pseudoscientific analysis of a witness’ nonverbal behavior in the courtroom","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pseudoscience; Psychology; Popularity; Lie detection; Witness; Economic Justice; Variety (cybernetics); Nonverbal communication; Empirical research; Social psychology; Deception; Epistemology; Developmental psychology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005567774,0.0002161754,0.0007403613,0.001039013,0.0002961721,0.00003162266,0.0007184787,0.0003041776,0.0009733742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001693112,0.000161101,0.0003796705,0.0006347675,0.001196145,0.0002158941,0.00003816008,0.0005033124,0.000009384921],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003040166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007560048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008977915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001392148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962273,0.001171003,0.001252257,0.0004214792,0.0006246679,0.0003032451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948885,0.0001523171,0.003006344,0.001288783,0.0005435768,0.0001204521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004426498,0.003228888,0.8985289,0.00003718245,0.001822361,0.00003739763,0.00781365,0.000116335,0.001175471,0.00647059,0.01225324,0.0640895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004411214,0.001354266,0.9811615,0.00002046064,0.005874834,0.0006674015,0.002273882,0.0003227665,0.0000146782,0.003263444,0.000491079,0.0001444793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822475,0.0006821863,0.0006331932,0.0008562431,0.0103848,0.0002740223,0.00006058593,0.000005150357,0.004856342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986054,0.0001045288,0.0005180345,0.0003905881,0.0002471503,0.00001778515,0.000008881822,0.00001347292,0.00009417773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08263261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07600610417548367,"score_gpt":0.4177057168665799,"score_spread":0.3416996126910963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}