{"id":"W2739731340","doi":"10.1093/forestscience/50.5.659","title":"Climate and Productivity of Major Conifer Species in the Interior of British Columbia, Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Science","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pinus contorta; Picea engelmannii; Site index; Douglas fir; Productivity; Frost (temperature); Forestry; Abies lasiocarpa; Environmental science; Latitude; Physical geography; Precipitation; Climate change; Elevation (ballistics); Geography; Ecology; Atmospheric sciences; Biology; Meteorology; Mathematics; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005701531,0.00003370054,0.0000805305,0.00001272718,0.00008697518,0.00002337785,0.0003112287,0.00001134498,0.00009987107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005803872,0.00003620425,0.000008483579,0.0002888581,0.001799842,0.0001729887,0.0002381977,0.0000445133,0.000002087744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008442871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006151642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.808615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992566,0.00001390883,0.0001255504,0.0001834609,0.0002333588,0.0001871978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997424,0.00001691406,0.00005870812,0.0001509411,0.000007159113,0.00002389122],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005619118,0.0000692696,0.9864758,0.00002410553,0.000001517151,0.00002028932,0.0003585325,0.0009602705,0.001455486,0.009593864,0.0007429075,0.0002923258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001392646,0.0000550429,0.9934982,0.00001753817,0.000002316585,0.00001089065,0.0002332971,0.00002756205,0.0001880482,0.005536064,0.0002504148,0.00004132852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975224,0.000009763587,0.00004247777,0.0002483671,0.00008129119,0.0001938234,0.00001216092,0.000002108994,0.001887564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995621,0.000007470707,0.000131382,0.000096089,0.000003490792,0.000008237298,3.472728e-7,0.000001449214,0.0001894733],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1885906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6631591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004171740734846423,"score_gpt":0.1776555562774774,"score_spread":0.173483815542631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}