{"id":"W2740106180","doi":"10.1109/cwit.2017.7994822","title":"On the design of good LDPC codes with joint genetic algorithm and linear programming optimization","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Error Correcting Code Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Low-density parity-check code; Computer science; Algorithm; Forward error correction; Decoding methods; Error detection and correction; EXIT chart; Coding (social sciences); Fading; Linear programming; Turbo code; Reliability (semiconductor); Concatenated error correction code; Mathematics; Block code; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000980293,0.000861164,0.0007645735,0.0007520843,0.0003458401,0.0006837753,0.0005205848,0.0009350476,0.0007050789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003477761,0.0004858549,0.0004577259,0.0008407167,0.0009387374,0.0006273683,0.0006186067,0.0007902725,0.000156716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007681088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001408016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003875575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00292528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995583,0.0002082358,0.00001516004,0.0000694662,0.0001092469,0.00003966495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988686,0.0008128646,0.0001130677,0.00003957828,0.0001405496,0.00002542742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001858013,0.00001693391,0.000184195,0.00002478925,0.00001141043,0.00001928127,0.00002654712,0.9778578,0.001075859,0.007465552,0.0001424129,0.01315672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003635814,0.00001380903,0.00002499772,0.000003730535,0.000002296975,0.000004855717,0.000002972441,0.9977953,0.0002750509,0.001743303,0.0001275562,0.000002396455],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02279421,0.0002826002,0.9742792,0.0001589631,0.00001331958,0.00004529638,0.00001677601,0.00009471112,0.002315098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.456247,0.0006190619,0.539797,0.0001475298,0.00002788389,0.0003148945,0.00007010117,0.00008010554,0.002696435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003875575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007706046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03601971333674957,"score_gpt":0.2588365043325651,"score_spread":0.2228167909958155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}