{"id":"W2740137264","doi":"","title":"Evaluation of the Ontario Empirical Method for Design of Composite Bridge Deck Slab Reinforcement","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Bridge deck; Deck; Reinforcement; Slab; Structural engineering; Composite number; Engineering; Forensic engineering; Materials science; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00291011,0.0005173222,0.0003825305,0.0007882696,0.0007171151,0.0005728099,0.001294659,0.0005771767,0.00300411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01358102,0.0004163198,0.000279266,0.0004937417,0.0005193162,0.0004829153,0.0006439863,0.000429717,0.0002460019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002561854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005226649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1644046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3112997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988286,0.0005781751,0.00003806972,0.00008051809,0.0004184709,0.00005606993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936612,0.003882385,0.0002502554,0.0003221261,0.001789736,0.00009427623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006687882,0.0003366865,0.02001198,0.0002110406,0.00005196478,0.00008537309,0.0005671938,0.6998091,0.006893755,0.02199285,0.001963299,0.247408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003068282,0.00009145997,0.002157497,0.00001003958,0.00001048095,0.00001556516,0.0000626996,0.99443,0.001389347,0.0004628175,0.001330704,0.000008728066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2602971,0.0001636847,0.7184802,0.0001473424,0.00003329022,0.0002766905,0.0002320769,0.0004648073,0.01990473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6188651,0.00009595264,0.3758944,0.0000335042,0.000008929984,0.0002065663,0.0001609377,0.0001840648,0.004550652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1644046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3268952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1207360510876971,"score_gpt":0.3529788837173963,"score_spread":0.2322428326296992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}