{"id":"W2740230008","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2011-0009","title":"APPROACHES TO NON-CONTACT ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURY STUDIES: UTILITY OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Anterior cruciate ligament; ACL injury; Multidisciplinary approach; Computer science; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Biomechanics; Artificial intelligence; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Engineering; Medicine; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00716839,0.002189401,0.002141642,0.00695751,0.0008060126,0.004261888,0.002272081,0.001629702,0.002462789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01217462,0.0008965848,0.002018095,0.003689337,0.002881311,0.002294896,0.00308735,0.001899779,0.0003430839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001352748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002648175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001968091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001903438,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937364,0.004319916,0.0004699208,0.0005807808,0.0007711498,0.0001217618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874949,0.0102429,0.0009640193,0.0004592793,0.0005932805,0.000245612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001871371,0.0009653939,0.009113553,0.001784641,0.0006745986,0.0004470341,0.000678263,0.4462668,0.002450139,0.2251925,0.002561374,0.3096786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000605401,0.000397011,0.001740554,0.0002147008,0.0000947248,0.0001871194,0.0006304081,0.6972378,0.0005945065,0.2942269,0.004547444,0.00006834826],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004702484,0.001739409,0.9893507,0.001106061,0.0000706092,0.0001869097,0.00005711022,0.00004625862,0.002740541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1963838,0.005082967,0.7944921,0.0004051154,0.0004773057,0.001437285,0.0001969312,0.0000458183,0.001478623],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00716839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03791058,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2262991772272992,"score_gpt":0.3385500228319663,"score_spread":0.1122508456046671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}