{"id":"W2740862827","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.12315","title":"A review of the flood risk management governance and resilience literature","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Nature","keywords":"Flood myth; Resilience (materials science); Risk governance; Corporate governance; Scope (computer science); Flood risk management; Vulnerability (computing); Variety (cybernetics); Environmental resource management; Community resilience; Risk management; Flooding (psychology); Political science; Environmental planning; Sociology; Process management; Business; Geography; Computer science; Psychology; Environmental science; Resource (disambiguation); Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001643644,0.0008970572,0.001106019,0.006823574,0.0006919621,0.002141488,0.001014082,0.001418417,0.005796261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006293199,0.0004358777,0.0009419345,0.009561273,0.0008538744,0.002617576,0.00115981,0.001399132,0.0009557624],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001806978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006778796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005925124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01112074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991763,0.0001920782,0.0001815393,0.0001100812,0.0002768228,0.00006315822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964143,0.002392865,0.0004530777,0.00005537117,0.0005418622,0.0001425523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000439955,0.00006418816,0.0008269853,0.1061917,0.0002276975,0.0003646242,0.0009237248,0.0006331996,0.0005138704,0.01168943,0.06079984,0.8177208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000969176,0.00005258824,0.003907579,0.08648621,0.0003507254,0.001009198,0.0007469892,0.0001083037,0.0001464873,0.004789029,0.9023586,0.00003463621],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001775116,0.9974945,0.0001088751,0.0008391109,0.0001808385,0.000006126795,0.00002632084,0.000004066814,0.001162594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001189126,0.9981371,0.0001337312,0.0002035147,0.0001221665,0.000007045205,0.00002361024,0.000001126195,0.0001825867],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006823574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0193904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0126444395472999,"score_gpt":0.2916380305871584,"score_spread":0.2789935910398585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}