{"id":"W2740862827","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.12315","title":"A review of the flood risk management governance and resilience literature","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Nature","keywords":"Flood myth; Resilience (materials science); Risk governance; Corporate governance; Scope (computer science); Flood risk management; Vulnerability (computing); Variety (cybernetics); Environmental resource management; Community resilience; Risk management; Flooding (psychology); Political science; Environmental planning; Sociology; Process management; Business; Geography; Computer science; Psychology; Environmental science; Resource (disambiguation); Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003091248,0.0008244134,0.002180316,0.0001819016,0.0005087473,0.0002236349,0.003202604,0.0001876609,0.0002047801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001293002,0.0004901632,0.001273553,0.0007334042,0.0003538126,0.0005485816,0.003137031,0.00119187,0.00006385826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003584151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003807644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006777148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004417852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941622,0.000702542,0.002062876,0.0007871356,0.001716047,0.0005692011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897987,0.00008938093,0.007757153,0.002097191,0.00005767808,0.000199861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001253433,0.0002081811,0.000246115,0.06011507,0.001115357,0.0001385432,0.00005253808,0.00004494902,2.79416e-8,0.0005527092,0.0460922,0.8914218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005739566,0.0001379813,0.001845242,0.1423503,0.007775821,0.0000541558,0.00002961905,0.00001340167,4.628332e-7,0.0004472028,0.8463503,0.0004215594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001195124,0.9721077,0.0001766163,0.0001632815,0.001000921,0.002402926,0.00008485912,0.00001412399,0.02403764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00002095394,0.9892795,0.006125567,0.0001820036,0.0001664391,0.00007593051,0.000005750435,0.00006045454,0.004083398],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8910002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0126444395472999,"score_gpt":0.2916380305871584,"score_spread":0.2789935910398585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}