{"id":"W2741143259","doi":"10.24912/ja.v21i1.135","title":"PROFITS: A CASE OF EXCHANGE RATE VOLATILITY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Akuntansi","topic":"Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volatility (finance); Revenue; Exchange rate; Business; Profit (economics); Economics; Monetary economics; Econometrics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Finance; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003985274,0.0001353389,0.0002638658,0.00006426924,0.0004172514,0.0002515332,0.0003041597,0.00004787744,0.00019594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000133332,0.0001110022,0.0001258317,0.0001572728,0.00008864622,0.001150589,0.0001713927,0.0001075063,0.00007153311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001741445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002316589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004656428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002902539,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999137,0.00000725345,0.0002945715,0.0002116589,0.000160263,0.0001892307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998335,0.000009583053,0.0009203628,0.0004613327,0.0002615742,0.00001216538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004940919,0.0004917707,0.7754579,0.001172807,0.000184395,0.004792476,0.0001889708,0.00001529842,0.005405039,0.07361467,0.01690244,0.1212801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001088024,0.00003428938,0.8780259,0.0001840443,0.0002159027,0.00009213166,0.0001264859,0.01063802,0.0007710821,0.009529091,0.09879322,0.0005017808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.982358,0.0001108627,0.0001127566,0.0006072879,0.0002501404,0.0001106282,0.00001077415,0.0000206879,0.01641886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978158,0.00001466818,0.00004548748,0.000408524,0.0007966514,0.000007688021,0.00000311488,0.00001196451,0.0008960485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1207783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7039158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0266252795975526,"score_gpt":0.2384905738982567,"score_spread":0.2118652943007041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}