{"id":"W2741191937","doi":"10.1139/cjss-2017-0044","title":"Evaluation of the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) Model on Predicting Crop Yield in the Canadian Prairies, a Case Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Soil Science","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Association of Friendship Centres; Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture; University of Saskatchewan; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","keywords":"Mean squared error; Canola; Cropping; Environmental science; Yield (engineering); Crop yield; Mathematics; Tillage; Cropping system; Agronomy; Agriculture; Crop; Statistics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001522296,0.001195853,0.0005611051,0.0004131182,0.0009296294,0.001063892,0.001694534,0.0006762423,0.0008353426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002411024,0.0004512771,0.0004287231,0.0007681975,0.000530331,0.0005514296,0.0005829806,0.0007237032,0.00008147868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01015753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01045417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9557329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9452824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996271,0.00009775448,0.00002000974,0.00008477545,0.00008380935,0.00008652073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990607,0.000360449,0.00005333884,0.00004184207,0.0003992543,0.00008451081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001569403,0.0001762694,0.02467633,0.00005318955,0.00006814274,0.0001316539,0.00007222694,0.9655684,0.0007514569,0.0005110891,0.0008017119,0.007032618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006759915,0.00007572558,0.01112449,0.000006398105,0.000031931,0.000008880254,0.00008091531,0.9874746,0.0005212734,0.00008621953,0.0005045912,0.00001734658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936055,0.0001187926,0.001595063,0.0001921368,0.00001066688,0.00007481452,0.001056466,0.0001656311,0.003180924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993189,0.000117749,0.004690781,0.00003479339,0.000003481016,0.00003510349,0.0009956388,0.00002093529,0.0009126524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04426712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0890556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06355330092456953,"score_gpt":0.2778463431917817,"score_spread":0.2142930422672122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}