{"id":"W2741287368","doi":"10.1139/x11-033","title":"A comparison of small-area estimation techniques to estimate selected stand attributes using LiDAR-derived auxiliary variables","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Small area estimation; Estimator; Basal area; Mathematics; Statistics; Lidar; Best linear unbiased prediction; Mean squared error; Population; Ranging; Estimation; Remote sensing; Geography; Forestry; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001069963,0.0001014061,0.0002269769,0.0003688727,0.0003014761,0.00005749088,0.0003536365,0.00008232451,0.0001871459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005169257,0.00009344741,0.00004018389,0.0009679291,0.000304571,0.0001333461,0.00004555178,0.0003221515,0.00001357044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004491051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007547637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03435071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05329226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985209,0.0001315847,0.0004069558,0.0001536967,0.0003588406,0.0004280838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985779,0.0001080728,0.0001608983,0.0002239657,0.0003386418,0.0005905221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001052282,0.0001420642,0.8550965,0.00005143231,0.000056743,0.00006626358,0.006398295,0.01625379,0.09401479,0.0002707014,0.003817738,0.02372647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003023514,0.0008510669,0.8003361,0.0004927065,0.00004679046,0.0001667346,0.0004891211,0.04363935,0.1466249,0.003530391,0.003214029,0.0003065153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9578933,0.00005533948,0.03972721,0.0001579313,0.00002591327,0.0002516418,0.00001189408,0.000009798203,0.001866981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8767509,0.000002631412,0.1231691,0.000007005322,0.00001738193,0.000001420117,0.000003557341,0.00001344679,0.0000345072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08344189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9720796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1214053936422392,"score_gpt":0.3665312828789349,"score_spread":0.2451258892366957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}