{"id":"W2742129295","doi":"10.1109/tie.2017.2733460","title":"A Computer-Aided Design Process for Optimizing the Size of Inverter-Fed Permanent Magnet Motors","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics","topic":"Electric Motor Design and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"University of Tehran; McGill University","keywords":"Inverter; Sizing; Computer science; Process (computing); Reliability (semiconductor); Control engineering; Transient (computer programming); Design process; Magnet; Engineering; Voltage; Electrical engineering; Work in process","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009043222,0.0008048368,0.0005559386,0.0005830106,0.0003507009,0.0006640909,0.0007467459,0.0004929338,0.005235371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001649981,0.0003797462,0.0005174554,0.0003548407,0.0002766399,0.0003127163,0.0003171902,0.00059283,0.000743884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005015152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001107005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001475453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002845885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996233,0.00009163142,0.00001787548,0.00004590473,0.0001938396,0.00002733151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994841,0.0002444031,0.00005008734,0.00004951334,0.0001619738,0.00001008245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009588267,0.0000986482,0.0005831512,0.0003537569,0.00003821231,0.0001081213,0.0001432599,0.7577325,0.04226081,0.01586205,0.002136381,0.1805872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003664137,0.0001396537,0.0002270542,0.00001652031,0.00001940343,0.00004147266,0.00002111939,0.9795375,0.01139591,0.001883133,0.006671292,0.00001029966],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006379758,0.00004487311,0.9894167,0.00002481582,0.00001490215,0.0001155204,0.00004464535,0.0008207413,0.003137977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1136476,0.00006704863,0.8841141,0.00002328687,0.000008152979,0.0003771063,0.0001068724,0.000158335,0.001497517],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005235371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01751405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04485067649772603,"score_gpt":0.2543718581281686,"score_spread":0.2095211816304426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}