{"id":"W2742349890","doi":"10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.028","title":"A clustering method for analysis of morphology of short natural fibers in composites based on X-ray microtomography","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Composites Part A Applied Science and Manufacturing","topic":"Composite Material Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Composite material; Void (composites); Composite number; Morphological analysis; Characterization (materials science); X-ray microtomography; Phase (matter); Microstructure; Morphology (biology); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Nanotechnology; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005637995,0.0007097533,0.0007475886,0.003079035,0.0008910652,0.000829924,0.001171639,0.0007183059,0.001766327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009443793,0.0004683102,0.001139186,0.002495456,0.0004731983,0.0006663637,0.0006328564,0.000661841,0.0007946661],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005858553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001069064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00599801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008404815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999436,0.00005921416,0.00004214728,0.0001727501,0.0002315703,0.00005826139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991022,0.0002192733,0.000108685,0.0001060395,0.000409937,0.00005374394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002781069,0.0001858345,0.004023965,0.0004690476,0.000254284,0.0001780106,0.000429384,0.03582133,0.345816,0.00333423,0.002980022,0.6062298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002902773,0.0001192475,0.01815775,0.00002989934,0.00012839,0.000570553,0.0002308516,0.8727831,0.09817556,0.003006461,0.006640802,0.0001283771],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02702066,0.000227191,0.9701559,0.00004303275,0.0000262446,0.00009548379,0.0002294577,0.001658503,0.0005435255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1064994,0.0002110538,0.8907031,0.00002689045,0.00002535629,0.0001859249,0.0006980465,0.0003161286,0.00133415],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00599801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01192623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01538522663114352,"score_gpt":0.270537655874267,"score_spread":0.2551524292431235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}