{"id":"W2742527285","doi":"10.1051/matecconf/201712002017","title":"Comparison between major repair and replacement options for a bridge deck life cycle assessment: A case study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MATEC Web of Conferences","topic":"Concrete Corrosion and Durability","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Bridge (graph theory); Deck; Bridge deck; Engineering; Transport engineering; Rehabilitation; Energy consumption; Forensic engineering; Civil engineering; Construction engineering; Production (economics); Structural engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001557001,0.0007922137,0.0006104064,0.003052311,0.0005826378,0.001103091,0.0007158585,0.001080559,0.001931475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002100477,0.0003367093,0.001228538,0.001676879,0.0003606727,0.0006088011,0.0004234048,0.0003288413,0.0001830916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003709219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001628391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06605563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1410935,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993821,0.0001389166,0.00003296926,0.00008485625,0.0002587099,0.000102301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984643,0.0007765254,0.0001071284,0.00007373427,0.0005058217,0.00007244202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001237231,0.0008613304,0.09225284,0.0007763238,0.0002860575,0.001618281,0.0005448645,0.767067,0.03011291,0.002363677,0.00158948,0.10129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001052389,0.002948934,0.1406844,0.0001138973,0.0004359542,0.0007335709,0.00255361,0.8200756,0.02429546,0.001511287,0.006425877,0.000116054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900636,0.0003715431,0.0052122,0.00004705674,0.000005293672,0.0001741575,0.0007567029,0.00003284864,0.003336565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895169,0.000275713,0.007900052,0.00000920516,0.000002257141,0.00005894255,0.0007333301,0.00001258944,0.001490953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06605563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1313423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07422207857495206,"score_gpt":0.3641517253009186,"score_spread":0.2899296467259665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}