{"id":"W2743058423","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2017-0114","title":"At the forefront: evidence of the applicability of using environmental DNA to quantify the abundance of fish populations in natural lentic waters with additional sampling considerations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Utah State University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Salvelinus; Environmental DNA; Lake ecosystem; Abundance (ecology); Sampling (signal processing); Ecology; Relative species abundance; Environmental science; Arctic char; Population; Biology; Aquatic ecosystem; Ecosystem; Fishery; Biodiversity; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Trout","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003547859,0.00006815067,0.0001249942,0.00002217564,0.00129574,0.00005422035,0.0003864862,0.000014554,0.0002691732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002466864,0.00003462324,0.00004062089,0.00007550675,0.005314864,0.0003443265,0.0001303342,0.00007008423,5.51549e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001302566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003957529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004590029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0435107,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991744,0.00003787718,0.000247037,0.0001106247,0.0003011563,0.0001289304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999169,0.0002347686,0.000353562,0.0001817718,0.000005086518,0.00005583349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006572232,0.000006823367,0.9957328,0.000004568514,0.000006540819,4.724168e-7,0.001492763,0.00121739,0.001017847,0.00002572723,0.0002606852,0.000227849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006959861,0.00005791202,0.9955317,0.00011531,0.00001754355,0.000009692304,0.002725535,0.0003418318,0.0005315255,0.0004455527,0.0001066304,0.00004715232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950671,0.00007722372,0.00002609287,0.004458582,0.00006445204,0.0001586251,0.0001061538,2.506166e-7,0.00004158898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982204,0.000009716619,0.001625383,0.0001188328,0.000005480768,0.000001736559,5.810762e-7,0.000001543421,0.00001634767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03892067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08509716912011717,"score_gpt":0.2663708273439775,"score_spread":0.1812736582238603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}