{"id":"W2743381849","doi":"10.1016/j.autcon.2017.07.003","title":"Credible interval estimation for fraction nonconforming: Analytical and numerical solutions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Automation in Construction","topic":"Control Systems and Identification","field":"Engineering","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fraction (chemistry); Interval (graph theory); Interval estimation; Estimation; Confidence interval; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Algorithm; Applied mathematics; Engineering; Chromatography; Combinatorics; Systems engineering; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0267272,0.001964137,0.004097597,0.005062268,0.001207393,0.004347752,0.004661323,0.003903303,0.006533419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1816645,0.001625244,0.003120444,0.003319182,0.006288052,0.006946986,0.003650027,0.005972879,0.0005040265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003187754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002388683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009120689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004481799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938088,0.003860826,0.0002077855,0.0009266955,0.000773465,0.0004223874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7583507,0.2263855,0.004677256,0.003954229,0.005325546,0.001306853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001256015,0.00005209135,0.001440803,0.0003199529,0.0001579318,0.0002186032,0.0003702997,0.7013042,0.0003874814,0.2773542,0.002000681,0.01626811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001394378,0.0000193382,0.0002634764,0.00007745755,0.00002814496,0.00005130775,0.00007013701,0.9173522,0.000177035,0.08145796,0.0004549696,0.00003397837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01195393,0.001209936,0.9831262,0.0005046114,0.00005257805,0.00005855339,0.0001060675,0.000104851,0.002883229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6811059,0.004325462,0.3038471,0.0003867864,0.000535925,0.000567689,0.0008404291,0.0004275574,0.007963222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0267272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1413487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02318955496600995,"score_gpt":0.2805633973500133,"score_spread":0.2573738423840034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}