{"id":"W2743977212","doi":"10.1111/joic.12420","title":"Bioresorbable vascular scaffold to treat in‐stent restenosis: Single‐center experience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interventional Cardiology","topic":"Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Montreal Heart Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Restenosis; Conventional PCI; Everolimus; Myocardial infarction; Stent; Target lesion; Clinical endpoint; Coronary artery disease; Surgery; Thrombosis; Lesion; Drug-eluting stent; Revascularization; Bioresorbable scaffold; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Randomized controlled trial; Radiology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00161176,0.000595025,0.0005888057,0.0003968068,0.0003412215,0.0007013481,0.0004815134,0.0005889825,0.00112585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001910136,0.000186955,0.0006953179,0.0003819255,0.0004247931,0.0003753332,0.0003640911,0.0007425188,0.0004907633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002973251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004850229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000354983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004543679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992043,0.0003145795,0.0001027039,0.00013495,0.0001444119,0.00009908895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990716,0.0002376807,0.0002140398,0.0001178263,0.0001138675,0.000244991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009913407,0.0355183,0.2967826,0.0009926994,0.001941743,0.008551411,0.003192867,0.002927895,0.05163133,0.0006769615,0.003805157,0.5840657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007503325,0.2018903,0.6479536,0.0008938155,0.001617205,0.04852374,0.00250948,0.007160922,0.05774806,0.0007598588,0.02312054,0.0003190991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944443,0.002688152,0.001633438,0.0001408935,0.00004167976,0.0001321277,0.00005755587,0.00002653071,0.0008353006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916993,0.003903614,0.003031059,0.0003356702,0.0001835093,0.00009708833,0.0002682582,0.00002174999,0.0004597695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00161176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008523881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05049229394720591,"score_gpt":0.3385084262921763,"score_spread":0.2880161323449704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}