{"id":"W2744791849","doi":"10.1051/matecconf/201712008006","title":"Cost benefit analysis for failure of sewer pipelines","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MATEC Web of Conferences","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Cost–benefit analysis; Economic cost; Economic analysis; Dam failure; Risk analysis (engineering); Sewage; Economic impact analysis; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Civil engineering; Engineering; Environmental engineering; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00330492,0.001262412,0.0009559541,0.002593729,0.0005459978,0.002011843,0.001150485,0.001565222,0.006519772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007461102,0.0005488772,0.001658718,0.001479632,0.0008411126,0.001803536,0.00110519,0.001430466,0.0002935746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00326125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001983282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00822969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00468322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984044,0.0008506904,0.00003852019,0.00008196273,0.000373959,0.0002504326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953533,0.003724467,0.0002463149,0.0001095097,0.000445791,0.0001206246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002215999,0.0001017163,0.002278846,0.0002091112,0.0000998231,0.0002966223,0.00006888008,0.9408572,0.0009870301,0.03556892,0.001239757,0.01807049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003092852,0.0002274697,0.003493588,0.00008521594,0.0001684976,0.0001854254,0.0002055853,0.9742991,0.0004676108,0.01858861,0.002209631,0.00003837505],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4589542,0.006443781,0.4514912,0.003410747,0.0003045052,0.0007791608,0.001538212,0.000183895,0.07689431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740881,0.00150043,0.01383229,0.0001029905,0.00006865116,0.0002512602,0.0002530201,0.00004151588,0.009861705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00822969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02366215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02295352174628461,"score_gpt":0.2515947930412238,"score_spread":0.2286412712949392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}