{"id":"W2744791849","doi":"10.1051/matecconf/201712008006","title":"Cost benefit analysis for failure of sewer pipelines","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MATEC Web of Conferences","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Cost–benefit analysis; Economic cost; Economic analysis; Dam failure; Risk analysis (engineering); Sewage; Economic impact analysis; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Civil engineering; Engineering; Environmental engineering; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007160924,0.0001117436,0.0003296269,0.0001149569,0.00004957935,0.00004589944,0.0003174492,0.00007681308,0.00008237868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005635879,0.00009325312,0.0001280025,0.00007270552,0.00006905047,0.00005839642,0.0000231846,0.00005586593,7.432011e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004408856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002708826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001039251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003065031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994397,0.000002222974,0.0002253062,0.0000963569,0.0001039188,0.0001324589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994035,0.00004962254,0.00008452687,0.0003192965,0.0001092439,0.0000338577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004148072,0.00004072022,0.02490193,0.00114744,0.001901097,0.000001679118,0.0001258445,0.8380105,0.02196409,0.095311,0.00106409,0.01549006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001333514,0.0001768921,0.204732,0.0002245091,0.001106219,0.000003311046,0.0003388398,0.6301098,0.09202918,0.01977029,0.04928583,0.0008895907],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8794993,0.0003108185,0.1084632,0.0002998785,0.0004293951,0.0003067967,0.00023732,0.0002705645,0.01018273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982053,0.00003206421,0.001579308,0.000001977359,0.00002876166,0.00001396624,0.00001090367,0.000008851488,0.0001188754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2079007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3802752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02295352174628461,"score_gpt":0.2515947930412238,"score_spread":0.2286412712949392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}