{"id":"W2744930197","doi":"10.1111/auar.12194","title":"Value for Money and Risk Relationships in Public–Private Partnerships: Evaluating Program‐based Evidence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Accounting Review","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Business; Legitimacy; Public sector; Flexibility (engineering); Politics; Public economics; Value for money; Private sector; Realisation; Accounting; Software deployment; Valuation (finance); Political risk; Process (computing); Stakeholder engagement; Public relations; Economics; Political science; Economic growth","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01224478,0.0004666978,0.0006803622,0.0003869917,0.001382219,0.00347258,0.00120928,0.0001935801,0.00005539442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03681997,0.0004462236,0.0002357587,0.0007016667,0.0002130629,0.006728093,0.0003969158,0.0006697626,0.0001570054],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000998257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001236997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004118474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002969025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963174,0.0001861001,0.001016391,0.0009115016,0.0005834206,0.0009852027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955247,0.0006734354,0.002006666,0.001287291,0.0004444858,0.00006344056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003170019,0.0001120127,0.9105519,0.01027871,0.00005691303,0.000006985174,0.00002333324,0.00002243632,0.00004684214,0.02569584,0.004199838,0.04897349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002605566,0.00007784196,0.537707,0.03099585,0.001078035,0.000006687355,0.0001025392,0.02584628,0.00004389906,0.008651371,0.3910762,0.001808643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8788582,0.01805086,0.0002922385,0.07794291,0.0009351883,0.01505025,0.00002160315,0.001175335,0.007673436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868018,0.001726487,0.007931693,0.001446167,0.0006637175,0.001113149,0.00005212392,0.00008293761,0.0001818975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3868764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.40719794101065,"score_gpt":0.4228548621103695,"score_spread":0.0156569210997195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}