{"id":"W2745429127","doi":"10.1109/tac.2008.929391","title":"Time Optimal Swing-Up of the Planar Pendulum","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control","topic":"Control and Stability of Dynamical Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal control; Control theory (sociology); Double pendulum; Swing; Planar; Benchmark (surveying); Pendulum; Inverted pendulum; Nonlinear system; Computer science; Mathematics; Control (management); Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001796799,0.0002901227,0.0002359692,0.0003879505,0.0003312578,0.0004109357,0.0001867704,0.0003122834,0.002798821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008130853,0.0001429666,0.0002324844,0.000172655,0.0007414543,0.0004819811,0.0006087599,0.0002516943,0.0001902914],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003293435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002932657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001249128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008504846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999228,0.0000158714,0.000002869183,0.00001354544,0.00002664786,0.00001824488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999137,0.00002455873,0.00002103301,0.00000646847,0.00001768716,0.00001662164],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003513489,0.00004034184,0.001129299,0.000176697,0.00004996192,0.0006503068,0.0005161811,0.5837093,0.0441072,0.3225009,0.001894909,0.04487363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005057521,0.0002957814,0.0009500266,0.00003115227,0.00001279893,0.0001284272,0.0002177823,0.8566123,0.005152779,0.1337571,0.002764727,0.00002652815],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5996535,0.0003566978,0.3717052,0.0005400809,0.00005611384,0.00007116763,0.0001841166,0.0002817149,0.02715137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911898,0.00009041511,0.006112317,0.00002267885,0.000005388251,0.00002339447,0.00004199459,0.00001400817,0.002499856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002798821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009362996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006839176441734878,"score_gpt":0.1843185995982729,"score_spread":0.177479423156538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}