{"id":"W2745874810","doi":"10.1080/10357718.2017.1334190","title":"The benefits of foreign policy bipartisanship revisited: lessons from two Canadian cases","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal Of International Affairs","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign policy; Opposition (politics); Normative; Politics; Political science; Scholarship; Argument (complex analysis); Criticism; Political economy; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006754878,0.0007716417,0.000823567,0.003931484,0.04315906,0.01158183,0.002784101,0.005672301,0.006311469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01981792,0.0005165464,0.000736966,0.009117633,0.01390828,0.003930123,0.006007447,0.008138007,0.0003587525],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1954232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1440628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9940982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971694,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901761,0.001718231,0.0001795311,0.0004331449,0.002783031,0.004709918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986875,0.005852965,0.0006094807,0.000544192,0.004230937,0.001887346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001849355,0.0001519203,0.01347521,0.0003291306,0.00005374894,0.005297848,0.1284423,0.00210402,0.0004104211,0.7808934,0.03510612,0.03355098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002202715,0.00009489566,0.04163971,0.001261888,0.0002454023,0.001597202,0.4189982,0.003959731,0.001054482,0.06130455,0.4692143,0.0004094329],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3735925,0.004867462,0.001346879,0.05738463,0.0003171206,0.000197404,0.0003479303,0.00003725892,0.5619088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720559,0.003046887,0.0007347671,0.004028567,0.00005189238,0.00005995187,0.0001013399,0.00003479895,0.01988596],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1954232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9331951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.076286243959961,"score_gpt":0.3927301000434278,"score_spread":0.3164438560834668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}