{"id":"W2745985815","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21326","title":"The migratory bird treaty and a century of waterfowl conservation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Wildlife; Ingenuity; Bird conservation; Convention; Treaty; Geography; Population; Wildlife conservation; Waterfowl; Politics; Habitat; Ecology; Political science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Sociology; Law; Biology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006834069,0.00007270928,0.0001174008,0.00002832451,0.0004094079,0.00005030654,0.0002940611,0.00003422064,0.00003613552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005133449,0.00004671085,0.00004758716,0.00003177789,0.0002852848,0.000279197,0.0001671192,0.00008005368,0.00001512942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004332067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007260081,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008703364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001570227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992291,0.00005400208,0.0003099951,0.00008541722,0.0002071669,0.0001143311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999036,0.00005342806,0.0006008976,0.0002446512,0.00001977153,0.00004530144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007630732,0.00004306347,0.9566262,0.00001109544,0.00006260436,0.00001246263,0.0001325868,0.00002196413,0.00005877461,0.0004565096,0.03061704,0.01188137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004465753,0.00008596891,0.9228929,0.00002318753,0.00004931618,0.000009086481,0.0001859004,0.0001014009,0.00004229289,0.0006239256,0.07549227,0.00004717537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833125,0.00008434325,0.00005641648,0.01437117,0.000257886,0.0001136066,5.721799e-7,0.000004666964,0.001798869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996644,0.0008918586,0.0004068653,0.001482671,0.00004716985,0.000003393164,2.027183e-7,0.000006310917,0.0005175311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04487523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3148876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009157901796161523,"score_gpt":0.2185174035871766,"score_spread":0.2093595017910151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}