{"id":"W2746322026","doi":"","title":"Legal Modesty and Political Boldness: The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in Chaoulli V. Quebec","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Victory; Law; Politics; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Health care; Dispose pattern; Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005663862,0.0003241981,0.0005450504,0.001371593,0.04719704,0.01460634,0.002405924,0.01033698,0.005391102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01381821,0.0005076559,0.0005101234,0.001987603,0.01862905,0.002346356,0.003044853,0.01288736,0.0002729487],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1548347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1836897,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926457,0.001228257,0.00009953718,0.0005293181,0.001976578,0.003520478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935483,0.002654435,0.0002743724,0.0001503511,0.001821352,0.001551095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006139341,0.00003379513,0.004843529,0.00004468383,0.00003508759,0.0008139021,0.01529215,0.000458085,0.0004986221,0.8816161,0.08797313,0.008329482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000307978,0.00008411422,0.05062079,0.0009195356,0.0002142933,0.0003389664,0.04251865,0.002666452,0.001638921,0.1547152,0.7454902,0.000484864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1480339,0.01276813,0.0008848606,0.4801648,0.001286189,0.00007808447,0.0004152411,0.00004733904,0.3563215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.904695,0.002338013,0.0003483858,0.05837357,0.0002676629,0.00004203331,0.00006329342,0.00003033589,0.03384171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1548347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9802719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01968497722486387,"score_gpt":0.2691515264457322,"score_spread":0.2494665492208683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}