{"id":"W2747268871","doi":"10.1017/s0008423917000683","title":"Debating Basic Income: Distributive Justice and the Normative-Technical Nexus","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conditionality; Normative; Basic income; Distributive justice; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Nexus (standard); Law and economics; Income distribution; Distribution (mathematics); Economic Justice; Norm (philosophy); Economics; Distributive property; Public economics; Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Microeconomics; Law; Inequality; Politics; Social science; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005356088,0.00008570167,0.0001887839,0.00008220325,0.006031782,0.0007438895,0.001347647,0.00009130347,0.00003733395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04169443,0.00005677567,0.00006517774,0.0001810991,0.02452183,0.0008430932,0.00009391594,0.0006224148,0.000009690204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005171688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004507959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0754642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04310738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976637,0.0002241889,0.0002870653,0.0001300368,0.0005568352,0.001138126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995079,0.001241746,0.0001841019,0.0002261828,0.0004587871,0.002810207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005552656,0.000003153963,0.0009623342,0.000005044354,0.000002391516,0.00002318725,0.001406082,4.138951e-7,0.000004716949,0.9972674,0.0000406445,0.0002791346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004121916,0.0000474019,0.1988476,0.00007348207,0.00006556099,0.00005929139,0.002955319,0.00008577505,0.00003675045,0.7961622,0.001132333,0.0001221391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2817468,0.0001766626,0.001112756,0.2294986,0.001446122,0.0002428286,0.00006309817,0.00001275556,0.4857004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978435,0.00000512542,0.0001284769,0.001416758,0.0005549648,9.467601e-7,9.018856e-8,0.000002883393,0.00004724578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7160968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04580943441899412,"score_gpt":0.3560686669919422,"score_spread":0.3102592325729481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}