{"id":"W2747500870","doi":"10.1075/csl.52.1.02luo","title":"The effect of pitch interplay on English-speaking learners of Mandarin","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報) The journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association USA","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Mandarin Chinese; Intonation (linguistics); Linguistics; Intelligibility (philosophy); Sentence; Tone (literature); Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005585931,0.0003048611,0.0002894684,0.000240375,0.0003424935,0.0009770651,0.0002059322,0.0002975278,0.002997511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003723254,0.0001843251,0.0001576153,0.0001086354,0.00039695,0.0003833371,0.0005191547,0.0004092291,0.0003830151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001627755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002433521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001061207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001426876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996258,0.0001165455,0.00003553746,0.00008090738,0.00009469619,0.0000464573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979779,0.001097831,0.0003292571,0.00008122103,0.0002422276,0.0002715104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003584177,0.0008912478,0.2792735,0.0003641069,0.0001313631,0.002504795,0.0371742,0.0002913314,0.6249945,0.0003346303,0.0002438179,0.05021229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008877275,0.00401998,0.900853,0.00005966153,0.0001686054,0.001595733,0.028826,0.001048249,0.06041102,0.0004564127,0.002402919,0.0000696491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992003,0.0000343555,0.00006031383,0.00001032344,0.000002703803,0.00000422073,0.000007402562,0.000003082403,0.0006772274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999289,0.00004872217,0.0001727059,0.00001259208,0.000002179122,0.000007005812,0.00001286536,0.00000376212,0.0004511209],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002997511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01002771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005859565517715537,"score_gpt":0.3394789523763952,"score_spread":0.3336193868586796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}