{"id":"W2747509594","doi":"10.1287/serv.2017.0180","title":"Service Systems Analysis Methods and Components: A Systematic Literature Review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Service Science","topic":"Service and Product Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Service (business); Abstraction; Systematic review; Knowledge management; Focus (optics); Key (lock); Data science; Service system; Process management; Service design; Diversity (politics); Management science; Service delivery framework; Business; Sociology; Engineering; Computer security; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004741537,0.0002129901,0.0005395478,0.0005413573,0.001228059,0.003297408,0.001487378,0.00005355317,0.00001994353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004141623,0.0001659886,0.00005214248,0.006843389,0.00007457676,0.00461065,0.000576849,0.0001360822,0.0001320777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000248239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000278302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001982132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003225248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980534,0.00004617613,0.0004568904,0.0005878734,0.0005379864,0.0003176555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995726,0.00004377399,0.0008249134,0.001466383,0.001912402,0.00002655015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001725432,0.00008201764,0.005327384,0.9491689,0.0003581096,0.00001728157,0.0006944979,0.00009939159,0.01409863,0.02821158,0.0004302723,0.001494711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001450415,0.00002802393,0.1846776,0.3319841,0.009689663,0.000110862,0.003268206,0.4400958,0.0004479574,0.005445312,0.01986363,0.002938406],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4805456,0.2333839,0.002721271,0.2407487,0.006976345,0.007750805,0.00002956437,0.0009162949,0.0269276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7612157,0.003873242,0.005049546,0.2275716,0.001629885,0.0002174306,0.0001482951,0.00005762565,0.0002366525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6171848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04565516580920553,"score_gpt":0.3429137392684903,"score_spread":0.2972585734592848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}