{"id":"W2747788203","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0182856","title":"Transparency ethics in practice: Revisiting financial conflicts of interest disclosure forms in clinical practice guidelines","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"University of Oxford; Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Context (archaeology); Accounting; Medicine; Conflict of interest; Declaration; Full disclosure; Psychology; Family medicine; Business; Finance; Political science; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7114134,0.001717338,0.003261891,0.01400929,0.008611158,0.03194961,0.01151939,0.01601851,0.006534589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9275563,0.003865344,0.004788563,0.01476669,0.02696741,0.04817791,0.02606773,0.027732,0.003183396],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02588333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1302527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007727917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01643867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1313004,0.688646,0.1099906,0.008888593,0.05639042,0.004783927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.02567108,0.7895801,0.04749773,0.03754337,0.09448922,0.005218526],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002437675,0.0003906911,0.01389749,0.02078138,0.0004216956,0.001201835,0.07449519,0.001713362,0.0004273041,0.188873,0.1987304,0.4988239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005014729,0.0003927983,0.008786824,0.1297089,0.0005472525,0.002048253,0.03508571,0.005678266,0.001450579,0.1935768,0.6215074,0.0007156457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01837339,0.03787245,0.1909254,0.6700998,0.02661595,0.01306284,0.0009844052,0.001043988,0.04102184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2193616,0.02105141,0.6031216,0.1218714,0.008331285,0.02166484,0.00113317,0.001065702,0.00239884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9839815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3558787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8951407127445984,"score_gpt":0.677642403336014,"score_spread":0.2174983094085844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}