{"id":"W2748092152","doi":"","title":"Dynamically consistent inverse kinematics framework using optimizations for human motion analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Conference Proceedings","topic":"Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Kinematics; Inverse kinematics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Computer science; Motion capture; Inertial frame of reference; Inverse dynamics; Squat; Motion analysis; Motion (physics); Inertia; Control theory (sociology); Joint (building); Artificial intelligence; Computer vision; Mathematics; Robot; Engineering; Geometry; Physics; Structural engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004908592,0.000205193,0.000413747,0.0002672551,0.000755201,0.00004355133,0.0002177179,0.0003530264,0.000112236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004415901,0.0001594784,0.0001929706,0.0005248539,0.0001212167,0.0003066396,0.0000515212,0.0002539959,0.00003769003],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002103233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001370067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003568091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007432071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981686,0.00004717889,0.0006899314,0.0003999906,0.0002251952,0.0004690741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976625,0.0002256216,0.0005447482,0.0001847029,0.001225406,0.000157014],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001561076,0.001017244,0.1433692,0.002281432,0.001403811,0.00000159831,0.008427372,0.0001541893,0.443801,0.3928367,0.00351928,0.00303208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004881119,0.0003688132,0.09449992,0.006043152,0.005018321,0.00000449966,0.007476546,0.6103624,0.0003476033,0.2685357,0.0006990245,0.001762907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3828954,0.000004082347,0.6144788,0.0005377511,0.0002751391,0.0007544235,0.00004765557,0.0001175339,0.0008891895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9285808,0.0000268229,0.06957919,0.0002637522,0.0001979107,0.0002131296,0.00003495871,0.00002701795,0.00107637],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6102083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6503341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08102472836438036,"score_gpt":0.3898696939137055,"score_spread":0.3088449655493251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}