{"id":"W2748336118","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2017.1348056","title":"Ergonomic evaluation of a new truck seat design: a field study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","topic":"Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton; University of Waterloo; University of New Brunswick","funders":"New Brunswick Innovation Foundation","keywords":"Truck; Sitting; Engineering; Physical therapy; Car seat; Seat belt; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Automotive industry; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Medicine; Automotive engineering; Medical emergency","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001656328,0.0007616585,0.0006093407,0.0005725141,0.0006129874,0.0003659167,0.0005514735,0.0005351191,0.001983178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002241488,0.0003436006,0.0005125366,0.0002109947,0.0003536745,0.0004320248,0.0004416755,0.0003559922,0.0003623449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003345595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003469028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001937378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005472035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992946,0.0002151363,0.00006608537,0.0001451238,0.0001917212,0.0000873021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985807,0.0003175289,0.0001213408,0.0001256647,0.000616497,0.0002383679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0174286,0.070513,0.2480862,0.00202258,0.0003226985,0.00231875,0.01844058,0.001232495,0.5192389,0.0001882889,0.001329977,0.1188779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008943714,0.2545982,0.7016659,0.00008853745,0.0003429027,0.00201046,0.0100234,0.002115571,0.02436925,0.00008675596,0.003690473,0.000114143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995599,0.00001899029,0.0002215866,0.000006009496,0.000003524371,0.00007092302,0.00002778127,0.000002746791,0.00008839291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957038,0.00009240334,0.002834388,0.0000443887,0.00002573541,0.0001544707,0.0001658058,0.000006279773,0.0009727759],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001983178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008759558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07711401950786172,"score_gpt":0.3990406427909148,"score_spread":0.321926623283053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}