{"id":"W2748336118","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2017.1348056","title":"Ergonomic evaluation of a new truck seat design: a field study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","topic":"Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton; University of Waterloo; University of New Brunswick","funders":"New Brunswick Innovation Foundation","keywords":"Truck; Sitting; Engineering; Physical therapy; Car seat; Seat belt; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Automotive industry; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Medicine; Automotive engineering; Medical emergency","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001606938,0.0001018286,0.0002591173,0.0001718995,0.00009635854,0.00004630598,0.0002226332,0.00006461191,0.0001395242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001258273,0.00008602691,0.0001436487,0.00002318324,0.00005970667,0.0003221116,0.00005193816,0.0001331664,0.000003023734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001745175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000654085,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008056385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002983794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984956,0.0000886276,0.0006477998,0.0001260906,0.0005668023,0.00007506997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777,0.0002571228,0.000754249,0.0001780255,0.0009337713,0.0001069076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1912809,0.001991204,0.412021,0.0001259339,0.002886012,0.00001996731,0.00604814,0.01619564,0.00302419,0.002581356,0.002003668,0.361822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004998791,0.0008820497,0.9871857,0.0001130533,0.0001581661,0.00003455042,0.0003007743,0.005144963,0.0002439133,0.0004738563,0.0003877504,0.00007641177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897251,0.0001328666,0.007944607,0.0009145024,0.000688579,0.0003501457,0.000007145656,0.000003127488,0.0002339874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950427,0.0001095461,0.004117498,0.0001065264,0.0004917172,0.000001682451,0.000008714503,0.000007779435,0.0001138048],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5751647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3508075,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07711401950786172,"score_gpt":0.3990406427909148,"score_spread":0.321926623283053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}