{"id":"W2748810498","doi":"10.1093/jdh/epx026","title":"An Examination of the 1960s Attempt at a New Brand Identity for the General Post Office","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Design History","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Style (visual arts); Perspective (graphical); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Project commissioning; Jealousy; State (computer science); Publishing; Public relations; Corporate identity; Sociology; Management; Law; Political science; Psychology; Aesthetics; Computer science; Visual arts; Social psychology; Art","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00165558,0.0000508395,0.000130007,0.0000278064,0.001065022,0.00003059358,0.000650796,0.00005079244,0.000159488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000371187,0.00003197864,0.0001482257,0.00001142515,0.0004035324,0.000500475,0.00001837935,0.00008061503,0.000005100072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006519529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005415358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001331075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001700353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999225,0.0001662215,0.0002237929,0.00006449799,0.0001904611,0.0001299864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988787,0.0001882041,0.0005026222,0.0001937998,0.0001242042,0.000112423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001519788,0.0006089449,0.004220258,0.0001044812,0.0003314965,0.0000140128,0.1096752,0.0003109944,0.03601579,0.1381852,0.6359067,0.07310714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007748846,0.0002045446,0.1375451,0.00002542627,0.0001075391,0.000007940405,0.000427803,0.0001585545,0.0002081294,0.001747753,0.8586809,0.0001113878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9648438,0.002855059,0.006872951,0.003595775,0.005127191,0.0003514179,0.000009097587,0.000007258472,0.01633751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782187,0.00004826978,0.0002443498,0.0002798395,0.0009401895,0.000001167844,1.512417e-7,0.000004852716,0.02026253],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2227742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8191393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08786732762855047,"score_gpt":0.3154354715546609,"score_spread":0.2275681439261104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}