{"id":"W2749140773","doi":"10.17239/l1esll-2008.08.03.02","title":"Co-elaboration of meaning in peer-led literature circles in secondary school.The interplay between reading modes, quality of talk, and collaboration modes.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature","topic":"Parental Involvement in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Meaning (existential); Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Interpretation (philosophy); Qualitative research; Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Pedagogy; Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Sociology; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007754392,0.0004785189,0.0005584019,0.004865561,0.006149112,0.007786469,0.001641549,0.001485279,0.001620943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03245257,0.0006248063,0.0004427643,0.001503334,0.008040327,0.004008566,0.008833455,0.001589637,0.0004477279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002021904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002605808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002063879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004616729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9809256,0.0129848,0.0004602829,0.001552049,0.003114707,0.0009626514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739408,0.01530288,0.004504936,0.001645429,0.002234453,0.002371523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005068266,0.0001210585,0.02927384,0.00009620788,0.00002751323,0.0006663401,0.9438604,0.00009645196,0.002839745,0.002809376,0.0002088065,0.01994963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001704206,0.0002224098,0.06341957,0.0001751665,0.00003211006,0.0008778208,0.9103852,0.0006560951,0.002174711,0.007439894,0.0145446,0.00005543957],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869349,0.0002926956,0.002697725,0.000311288,0.00001232313,0.00006886118,0.00001355137,0.00004042183,0.009628201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971625,0.00009546238,0.001413152,0.00002990434,0.000006810651,0.00003977195,0.00001564101,0.00001809888,0.001218719],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007786469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0410096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04016349907667145,"score_gpt":0.4270824006617484,"score_spread":0.386918901585077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}