{"id":"W2749338420","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1604.08136","title":"Collective Stochastic Discrete Choice Problems: A Min-LQG Game Formulation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Mathematical optimization; Best response; Discrete choice; Mathematical economics; Discrete time and continuous time; Sequential game; Linear-quadratic-Gaussian control; Mathematics; Class (philosophy); Population; Computer science; Game theory; Optimal control; Econometrics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002644565,0.001108556,0.001540773,0.0005350423,0.0004983328,0.00188957,0.001618353,0.00219673,0.003136523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005060207,0.0005303563,0.0009478945,0.0006635114,0.002233458,0.001552242,0.00179669,0.002023809,0.0003139216],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001738288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001430719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005970361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002946652,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987718,0.0005871176,0.00003697609,0.0002575138,0.0002105574,0.0001360187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973762,0.001884092,0.0002519455,0.00007839873,0.0002358553,0.0001734877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004023601,0.000032446,0.0005758447,0.00007900294,0.00004601183,0.0001414019,0.0001075025,0.8144473,0.0004459037,0.1785978,0.001220269,0.004266269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001128362,0.00002024291,0.0000760258,0.000007179861,0.000006046245,0.00001256391,0.00001853086,0.9532228,0.00005059621,0.04602565,0.0005416187,0.000007590782],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02735662,0.0004551139,0.9600776,0.00151616,0.00009786902,0.00007659128,0.000219181,0.00008120067,0.01011967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8718644,0.0007080575,0.1085252,0.0006666686,0.0001973571,0.0006138507,0.00028175,0.00008001508,0.01706268],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005970361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01398599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04494207920868613,"score_gpt":0.2115316877907263,"score_spread":0.1665896085820402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}