{"id":"W2750045390","doi":"10.3390/pr5030044","title":"Comparison of CO2 Capture Approaches for Fossil-Based Power Generation: Review and Meta-Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Processes","topic":"Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Pusat Pengurusan Penyelidikan dan Instrumentasi","keywords":"Process engineering; Fossil fuel; Coal; Work (physics); Carbon capture and storage (timeline); Electricity generation; Environmental science; Power station; Combustion; Process (computing); Computer science; Waste management; Environmental economics; Engineering; Power (physics); Chemistry; Economics; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01007937,0.001908826,0.008657178,0.009432141,0.0003241171,0.002908872,0.00218311,0.001378263,0.004078895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02805382,0.000853551,0.01781999,0.01054206,0.0006396771,0.001644937,0.001184362,0.001302477,0.0002953342],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002530546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003963337,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004729359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01068515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962255,0.001669393,0.001046266,0.0004566089,0.0004797025,0.0001226454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804893,0.01572827,0.001948591,0.0004562436,0.001179983,0.0001977298],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001201165,0.00005292772,0.002255386,0.7010795,0.2092565,0.0001363124,0.0001635384,0.001493345,0.0004932538,0.0008019929,0.001198786,0.08186733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004085645,0.0005175626,0.006056286,0.1890406,0.7792187,0.0003119235,0.000193801,0.0004263969,0.0006992461,0.001275607,0.02179244,0.00005884784],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001361005,0.9972362,0.0005229049,0.0001661579,0.00005257085,0.00007415495,0.0002866503,0.00001171629,0.0002886828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04454019,0.9523132,0.001815681,0.0003507741,0.00008751258,0.0002212767,0.0005351969,0.0000199845,0.0001161988],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01007937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05330545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1607919128018523,"score_gpt":0.3285224478453962,"score_spread":0.1677305350435438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}