{"id":"W2750931630","doi":"10.1002/wsb.803","title":"An alternative minimally invasive technique for genetic sampling of bats: Wing swabs yield species identification","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada; University of Calgary; Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Shell Canada","keywords":"Biology; Wing; Sampling (signal processing); Identification (biology); DNA barcoding; Veterinary medicine; Invasive species; Species identification; Zoology; Ecology; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001730204,0.0006767164,0.0004946362,0.002196306,0.0007862123,0.00134056,0.0007266319,0.0006839083,0.002267073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003040388,0.0003407583,0.0002609718,0.00134653,0.0007036843,0.0008252135,0.0006260005,0.0005776812,0.001225985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005829903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008716402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0167942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0577778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983572,0.0004348945,0.0001192712,0.0003276963,0.0006559844,0.0001049151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966515,0.000940719,0.0008119461,0.0003203868,0.001085218,0.0001902569],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000578735,0.0002389578,0.1861138,0.000608128,0.000126275,0.0003987543,0.00072203,0.0003773139,0.7153991,0.0002458445,0.0008895,0.09430153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000360384,0.001131743,0.8476884,0.0002880913,0.0001737579,0.002066065,0.001471513,0.002813758,0.1335932,0.0004317003,0.01024213,0.00006350145],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.8955492,0.003647924,0.08684749,0.0003742133,0.0002560517,0.00124607,0.001933926,0.0004842008,0.00966102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7685504,0.001795025,0.2224673,0.0005593165,0.0000829468,0.0004076793,0.001150341,0.000106869,0.004880111],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0167942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03339291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05399585856014731,"score_gpt":0.2722694950639107,"score_spread":0.2182736365037634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}