{"id":"W2751124912","doi":"10.5751/es-09427-220317","title":"A quantitative framework for assessing ecological resilience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program; Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Geological Survey; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Resilience (materials science); Environmental resource management; Socio-ecological system; Ecological resilience; Adaptive management; Computer science; Ecosystem; Ecology; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental science; Business; Resource (disambiguation); Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02048355,0.002207686,0.001104274,0.008239667,0.001603641,0.005836169,0.002844891,0.002222137,0.004757242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03822388,0.0005323442,0.001748174,0.004579682,0.009697031,0.00888029,0.003809167,0.003714608,0.0008126895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003782517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002993293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003838809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002038855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9856558,0.008462026,0.001133554,0.001540493,0.002836907,0.0003713109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774486,0.01373593,0.002756619,0.002646073,0.002858736,0.0005540121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005924276,0.0000190085,0.000632882,0.0001588446,0.00004610046,0.00004307621,0.0002406892,0.0171569,0.000420006,0.9629078,0.001560928,0.0168078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003747701,0.00002680008,0.0005263111,0.0001676186,0.00001760194,0.00006529257,0.0001996225,0.01766704,0.0001968161,0.9643336,0.01676102,0.00003452201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002205591,0.002143205,0.9789362,0.002738053,0.0001814581,0.0001188191,0.0005055094,0.0001621484,0.01300901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2352931,0.003513125,0.7550473,0.00103674,0.000556067,0.001332826,0.0007159043,0.0001306766,0.002374231],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02048355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1083287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01901432227790806,"score_gpt":0.3208285503033099,"score_spread":0.3018142280254019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}