{"id":"W2751124912","doi":"10.5751/es-09427-220317","title":"A quantitative framework for assessing ecological resilience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program; Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Geological Survey; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Resilience (materials science); Environmental resource management; Socio-ecological system; Ecological resilience; Adaptive management; Computer science; Ecosystem; Ecology; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental science; Business; Resource (disambiguation); Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004429683,0.00007648002,0.0001318261,0.000003119249,0.001632609,0.00009286953,0.0002470315,0.0001905384,0.0001274781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003095819,0.00006045792,0.00006829094,0.00002046673,0.0007142641,0.000197865,0.0002125891,0.0001333143,0.00002685824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004561148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001153682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001965394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001690093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992927,0.00002533311,0.0001061935,0.0002846539,0.00005893604,0.0002321425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992512,0.0003662311,0.0001234742,0.000194161,0.000007341212,0.0000575285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001140956,0.00008481346,0.9321046,0.00001944987,0.00001675699,0.000004530834,0.001075713,0.0001937965,0.0006343782,0.0639007,0.001082773,0.0008710455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001382137,0.0001106091,0.9438998,0.000008230013,0.000006602826,0.000003601517,0.000619291,0.02310829,0.00001780458,0.03163426,0.0003597632,0.00009352313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847681,0.00002074767,0.009753614,0.0008349732,0.0002246476,0.0001868506,0.000003618165,0.00001407383,0.004193361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466281,0.00005316478,0.05266066,0.0003146509,0.00002120983,0.00003145531,6.829937e-7,0.000003830773,0.0002862518],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04290704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01901432227790806,"score_gpt":0.3208285503033099,"score_spread":0.3018142280254019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}