{"id":"W2751158865","doi":"10.4236/tel.2017.76106","title":"Endogenous versus Exogenous Fairness Indices in Repeated Ultimatum Games","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics Letters","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ultimatum game; Construct (python library); Index (typography); Communication source; Inequity aversion; Social psychology; Stochastic game; Microeconomics; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Inequality","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007219826,0.0002303726,0.0004057582,0.0001033808,0.000997102,0.0004058823,0.0009862746,0.0001412297,0.0002997446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002348564,0.0002584056,0.0001190933,0.0000374911,0.003594369,0.0004298601,0.0002815031,0.00023008,0.0002267308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006223022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008286422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003429344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003453688,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981911,0.000123681,0.0004046104,0.0004842197,0.00009345081,0.0007028952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987036,0.000232777,0.0002558134,0.0006093595,0.00002027567,0.0001781976],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003890171,0.0001385316,0.016883,0.000007061237,0.00006998269,0.00007889391,0.01652157,0.00005065214,0.003286219,0.9603483,0.00008822908,0.002138546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0583122,0.002654091,0.1361586,0.0006331129,0.0009815972,0.0001210845,0.1734158,0.002563868,0.1068766,0.4708676,0.03034532,0.01707016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8845477,0.00006653188,0.000004838816,0.005326238,0.0009363219,0.0003096048,0.00001788976,0.00006513587,0.1087257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986398,0.000267849,0.0002163954,0.0005632511,0.0001899074,0.00003998265,0.000006998211,0.00003248961,0.00004330769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4894807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05115202394338729,"score_gpt":0.3162555644589265,"score_spread":0.2651035405155392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}