{"id":"W2751161857","doi":"10.2495/sdp-v12-n8-1312-1325","title":"Optimizing the urban thermal environment at local scale: a case study in Wuhan, China","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning","topic":"Urban Heat Island Mitigation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Urban heat island; Microclimate; Urban planning; Scale (ratio); Environmental science; Urban climate; Moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer; Meteorology; Workflow; Remote sensing; Geography; Civil engineering; Satellite; Computer science; Cartography; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006543444,0.0005780392,0.0003718993,0.0008459977,0.00139873,0.001026038,0.001323713,0.0008782152,0.00083722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008317814,0.0002029301,0.0004848375,0.001804514,0.001017764,0.0006792662,0.001036357,0.0003801901,0.0001030933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004262843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002471768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1730253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2527586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995345,0.0001447818,0.00001695688,0.00007727,0.0001001842,0.0001263483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995927,0.000113852,0.00004498415,0.00004587095,0.0001105717,0.00009197548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005220583,0.001886119,0.3176892,0.0008779552,0.0004417336,0.04104104,0.01343177,0.4779845,0.02206104,0.01366909,0.006302948,0.1040924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001440102,0.0009589694,0.3520832,0.00009209428,0.0003020635,0.001465111,0.04677871,0.5674642,0.01265829,0.004049697,0.01377164,0.0002319929],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960915,0.00006959086,0.001643396,0.0001167337,0.000004290201,0.00009986547,0.0001036204,0.00002551308,0.001845345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963267,0.00009418342,0.002073647,0.00002006214,0.000003452378,0.00004791208,0.0001136468,0.000008407559,0.001311939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1730253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3440365,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01234856421453581,"score_gpt":0.2420443603592615,"score_spread":0.2296957961447257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}