{"id":"W2751443685","doi":"10.1080/14786435.2017.1364437","title":"A comparative study of nanovoid growth in FCC metals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Magazine A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics","topic":"Microstructure and mechanical properties","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Army Research Laboratory","keywords":"Quasistatic process; Materials science; Void (composites); Isothermal process; Thermal expansion; Aluminium; Adiabatic process; Strain rate; Quasistatic loading; Dislocation; Copper; Composite material; Condensed matter physics; Thermodynamics; Metallurgy; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004504891,0.0001795308,0.000611109,0.00002258609,0.000185119,0.00007280482,0.0005933457,0.00004509589,0.00009686654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000452415,0.00009362165,0.00007952366,0.00004808295,0.001311029,0.000127466,0.0003701488,0.0002808651,0.000009698534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000136324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001649622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004652235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.609982e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986998,0.0001198201,0.0005042221,0.0001728707,0.0003208042,0.0001825043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990562,0.0001232295,0.0003876548,0.0002662512,0.00006890026,0.00009782832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005671171,0.0005245763,0.000005161863,0.000007052655,0.00001815521,0.000003504907,0.001288641,0.000005187218,0.5656233,0.4319005,0.000004416486,0.00005231594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001077081,0.000663664,0.00008877197,0.00002285381,0.00003250321,0.0000135018,0.000576475,0.00003178871,0.5548984,0.4425132,0.000002279098,0.0000794475],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960733,0.0001827367,0.0001229135,0.001110979,0.00008687523,0.0002653417,0.000005144528,0.000003953833,0.002148764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994239,0.000007206682,0.0002087781,0.0001312573,0.0002078182,0.000007975863,2.420381e-7,0.000009935237,0.000002945533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01072493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4830541,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03283112705682153,"score_gpt":0.2964491403684808,"score_spread":0.2636180133116593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}