{"id":"W2751608354","doi":"10.1002/rcm.7983","title":"An investigation of the beam damage effect on <i>in situ</i> liquid secondary ion mass spectrometry analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry","topic":"Ion-surface interactions and analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Particle Physics","funders":"Laboratory Directed Research and Development; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Biological and Environmental Research; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Chemistry; Secondary ion mass spectrometry; Ion; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Static secondary-ion mass spectrometry; Ion beam; Mass spectrometry; Fragmentation (computing); Polyatomic ion; In situ; Ion beam deposition; Ion source; Chromatography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009956399,0.0002699296,0.0005353879,0.001775877,0.0003857682,0.0001487907,0.002277995,0.0001563705,0.0001623368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001219388,0.000244999,0.0003278352,0.002904793,0.0002259677,0.0005101894,0.0001646261,0.001025366,0.00001826877],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004067672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003548122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001989098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008773127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980533,0.0004008044,0.0006148653,0.0003119135,0.0003035188,0.0003156468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942206,0.0004001067,0.0002948984,0.004955763,0.00005594458,0.00007276109],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000346175,0.0001513717,0.09839806,0.00005297847,0.0005034723,0.000002390769,0.000243649,0.02528272,0.8737724,0.0009139785,0.00004578441,0.0005985525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006216648,0.0003477483,0.5854436,0.0001499591,0.0003537464,0.000001817206,0.0003264166,0.04341816,0.368003,0.0008311181,0.00008504336,0.0004176644],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856501,0.0003743266,0.001035941,0.0006286604,0.0001696558,0.0002355787,0.00002982399,0.00008158628,0.01179436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993849,0.0005611047,0.005313689,0.00003061962,0.00004322475,0.00004297253,0.00007894247,0.00003674324,0.000043727],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5057694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01073595338378083,"score_gpt":0.2653884745454845,"score_spread":0.2546525211617037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}