{"id":"W2752559259","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2017.1352915","title":"A case of values conflict in the video game design field. A critique of Schön’s appreciative system.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Casual; Conversation; Field (mathematics); Appreciative inquiry; Game design; Value (mathematics); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Computer science; Sociology; Aesthetics; Multimedia; Mathematics; Political science; Communication; Philosophy; Pedagogy; Law; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003676827,0.0001272229,0.0002400853,0.0001155245,0.0004649578,0.0002262888,0.0007177139,0.00006106112,0.00008337974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001462141,0.00007234583,0.00007353081,0.0001647442,0.0001601324,0.000667085,0.00008747642,0.0002673706,0.00001124477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002578122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005091138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001981971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001311648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987673,0.000325669,0.0003805107,0.0001046328,0.000253003,0.0001689257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974658,0.001000811,0.00084655,0.0002890708,0.000388605,0.000009170895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004935729,0.001559382,0.03329544,0.002579032,0.001598666,0.007794668,0.1390934,0.01008993,0.01030007,0.658929,0.1130041,0.01682064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01938024,0.002084755,0.09098391,0.01000221,0.002783467,0.01954966,0.2433268,0.1423327,0.07423856,0.3814587,0.01008983,0.003769149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.231593,0.0006752201,0.7534621,0.004533015,0.000693508,0.001433543,0.000009188836,0.00003205806,0.007568375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979472,0.00002122185,0.0004794914,0.0005347091,0.0009455541,0.00001429122,5.8364e-7,0.00001264938,0.00004425345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7663543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3576126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1148632409938129,"score_gpt":0.3128167484883568,"score_spread":0.1979535074945439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}