{"id":"W2753430738","doi":"10.1111/iere.12234","title":"DYNAMIC MECHANISM DESIGN FOR A GLOBAL COMMONS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Prairie Bible Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Economics; Commons; Global commons; Private information retrieval; Microeconomics; Value (mathematics); Complete information; Mechanism design; Welfare; Resource (disambiguation); Value of information; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Market economy; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005254109,0.001134086,0.001709724,0.00125448,0.001165216,0.003856808,0.00302213,0.00481238,0.01649968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01141514,0.0008362221,0.001869832,0.001553632,0.003598805,0.007575151,0.00319209,0.003563276,0.001299541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004042305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002645133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002854183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002089971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968641,0.001576288,0.0001340994,0.0006151518,0.0003693496,0.0004409844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907871,0.005970286,0.001293005,0.0008495292,0.000519109,0.0005809804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004718434,0.00004898302,0.0002761057,0.00007177223,0.00004850936,0.0001308285,0.00009596659,0.08836455,0.0003165879,0.904877,0.001300388,0.004422107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001305943,0.0000554164,0.0001628948,0.00003708734,0.00003600883,0.00009997543,0.00005651796,0.1764985,0.0001411697,0.8160746,0.006678785,0.00002832002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04680976,0.001357667,0.9035403,0.006049057,0.0002622586,0.0002652964,0.000723013,0.0003004886,0.04069218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87803,0.001689608,0.09201194,0.0008289238,0.0002477755,0.0008681863,0.0003233863,0.00009554384,0.02590468],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01649968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05519688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1894745176348589,"score_gpt":0.3552227005412356,"score_spread":0.1657481829063766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}