{"id":"W2753658688","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2017.1352958","title":"Understanding Collaborative Design Through Activity Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Teamwork; Multidisciplinary approach; Knowledge management; Activity theory; Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Value (mathematics); Collaborative design; Management science; Psychology; Engineering; Sociology; Cognitive science; Systems design; Software engineering; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01285817,0.001229385,0.0009535495,0.004201767,0.002852391,0.01147719,0.002370031,0.003467876,0.003601202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0142685,0.0007746049,0.001560379,0.002356598,0.0206498,0.0134119,0.005462812,0.003136101,0.0006675851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004484028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004188202,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002482655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001243882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9853603,0.01120363,0.0005498225,0.001124991,0.001299737,0.0004614266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827642,0.01409786,0.0006428031,0.00143779,0.0006699916,0.0003872968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006753487,0.00002376325,0.0003560486,0.0001522303,0.00001255227,0.00006788314,0.007531142,0.004235143,0.0001573648,0.9767299,0.0003678875,0.01035927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002350785,0.00002920751,0.0002022986,0.0002150328,0.00001481314,0.0001082936,0.002561267,0.01207427,0.0002750251,0.9502449,0.03423414,0.00001722177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01399518,0.002592003,0.9148074,0.003698294,0.0001578699,0.0002754119,0.00004832497,0.0001123047,0.06431328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5620396,0.003938885,0.4238879,0.0005797785,0.0001827823,0.001611717,0.000179758,0.0001068563,0.007472803],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01285817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06800133,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3234556605034867,"score_gpt":0.3450487194714577,"score_spread":0.02159305896797103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}