{"id":"W2753658688","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2017.1352958","title":"Understanding Collaborative Design Through Activity Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Teamwork; Multidisciplinary approach; Knowledge management; Activity theory; Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Value (mathematics); Collaborative design; Management science; Psychology; Engineering; Sociology; Cognitive science; Systems design; Software engineering; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003004691,0.0001525909,0.0001405041,0.00003807166,0.001631564,0.0007951431,0.0005323748,0.00006130068,0.0002617076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004912386,0.0001062278,0.00004683462,0.00009226739,0.0001285499,0.001172278,0.00002043786,0.0005375707,0.0001057302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002144402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001674539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000181313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.884011e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983786,0.0009214669,0.0001450776,0.00009278307,0.0002044202,0.0002575999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997956,0.001295749,0.0001901432,0.0004064365,0.00007381603,0.00007782054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002965409,0.0003530275,0.0001408957,0.00006971894,0.002284546,0.0002974306,0.06939892,0.1424339,0.08102709,0.2075807,0.4396398,0.05380864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002515536,0.0004190346,0.001828899,0.0001918254,0.0004332667,0.001478791,0.01257391,0.03749048,0.06933963,0.8203254,0.05209295,0.001310317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004407565,0.0002672721,0.969216,0.001211767,0.001185451,0.0002067297,0.000001400741,0.00007292778,0.0273977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837316,0.0003516395,0.0147416,0.000179079,0.0003723273,0.00001035481,1.261175e-7,0.0000352103,0.0005780748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996682,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3234556605034867,"score_gpt":0.3450487194714577,"score_spread":0.02159305896797103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}