{"id":"W2753844555","doi":"10.3920/bm2017.0032","title":"Is there a role for modified probiotics as beneficial microbes: a systematic review of the literature","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Beneficial Microbes","topic":"Probiotics and Fermented Foods","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Probiotic; Adverse effect; Clinical trial; Randomized controlled trial; Meta-analysis; Intensive care medicine; MEDLINE; CINAHL; Placebo; Internal medicine; Systematic review; Incidence (geometry); Alternative medicine; Psychological intervention; Pathology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004974364,0.0007353499,0.003004743,0.00003544401,0.0005779191,0.0002915224,0.002088261,0.0007873483,0.00004357109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003414625,0.0002361998,0.002164435,0.0004055572,0.0001074441,0.00007253068,0.0003928826,0.0004151209,0.00002355748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007082842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001656465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006456998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001928024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969593,0.0002066091,0.001380068,0.0006659775,0.0002650362,0.0005229567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969597,0.0002563625,0.001808231,0.0005515545,0.0003376563,0.00008652024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001369937,0.0001920525,4.668206e-7,0.9361826,0.00026758,0.000001387024,0.00009459908,1.346781e-7,0.0008380917,0.001148702,0.0004479454,0.06081276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007303181,0.000188583,0.000001715198,0.6591713,0.001800368,0.00003076119,0.00002584953,0.000001310788,0.0001639918,0.0003406524,0.3377801,0.0004222534],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001770236,0.988441,5.771737e-7,0.0003329118,0.0003781302,0.00649836,0.003821468,0.00003295994,0.0003176045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003515791,0.9974901,0.00004332419,0.0003203875,0.0004693317,0.000218852,0.0004484269,0.00001352354,0.0006444658],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3373322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9631947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04882990934864757,"score_gpt":0.300996513670032,"score_spread":0.2521666043213844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}