{"id":"W2753979396","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i3.4947","title":"Précis of The Concept of Argument. A Philosophical Foundation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophical and Historical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Foundation (evidence); Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Dialectic; Perspective (graphical); Pragmatism; Hegelianism; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Philosophical methodology; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002105036,0.00005222828,0.0001409642,0.00001264082,0.0009050348,0.00001988011,0.0004770733,0.00006534538,0.0001227224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006590268,0.00003177293,0.00009043202,0.00005790159,0.001369962,0.0002191503,0.0001635399,0.000088863,0.00001511499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003346526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005096469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001350799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992291,0.00002888146,0.0002104361,0.00006082343,0.0003366205,0.0001341308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993302,0.00004593267,0.0002880345,0.0001921276,0.0001033308,0.00004037185],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001618313,0.00003844369,0.003177477,0.000006747683,0.00001148462,2.427829e-7,0.002376316,0.000002604098,0.00002961532,0.990298,0.0001206978,0.003922191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004496576,0.0001728047,0.08248999,0.00003212693,0.00002741731,3.985893e-7,0.0002619938,0.00001504714,0.0003816476,0.7640758,0.1519567,0.0001364141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1136181,0.0001660949,0.00004141632,0.03373165,0.0007086577,0.0002818151,0.0000108624,0.00002416284,0.8514173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992068,0.00002914169,0.00004029074,0.0001858392,0.0001864812,0.000004893348,5.561939e-7,0.000001348316,0.0003446799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8855887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6960887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.072907862517752,"score_gpt":0.32785812691765,"score_spread":0.254950264399898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}