{"id":"W2754125339","doi":"10.17925/ee.2017.13.02.91","title":"Ranibizumab in Diabetic Macular Oedema – A Benefit–risk Analysis of Ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN Versus Laser Treatment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"touchREVIEWS in Endocrinology","topic":"Retinal Diseases and Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility; National Institute for Health and Care Research; Pfizer; Eli Lilly and Company","keywords":"Ranibizumab; Medicine; Ophthalmology; Pro re nata; Visual acuity; Endophthalmitis; Laser coagulation; Diabetic macular edema; Diabetic retinopathy; Surgery; Bevacizumab; Diabetes mellitus","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001324465,0.000387307,0.001960642,0.0005896715,0.00009761906,0.00001724867,0.0002948623,0.0001141584,0.0004979538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003247145,0.0002959057,0.0007204021,0.0004117578,0.0001925729,0.00008250689,0.0001034957,0.0001738521,0.00008790367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003737935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008398057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002320247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002293468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974285,0.0001975769,0.000866288,0.0006327382,0.0002299965,0.0006448631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976042,0.0001574562,0.0004928167,0.001521522,0.00006449637,0.0001595093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002770831,0.0017153,0.806903,0.0002219634,0.003053589,0.001725633,0.0001801986,0.0001143087,0.00007976914,0.000476617,0.00002351638,0.1827353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02325072,0.001892439,0.9615828,0.0002813377,0.008151432,0.00002631751,0.0000556616,0.0005517722,0.0006320694,0.0001942323,0.0031191,0.000262154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811017,0.01416447,0.000005488208,0.0003055661,0.0001671847,0.001175433,0.00007986493,0.00002136612,0.002978926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620359,0.0369376,0.0002741915,0.0000436392,0.00003769372,0.000261182,0.0001000864,0.00002773132,0.0002819986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1824731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999493,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04195603854146926,"score_gpt":0.3559446583775987,"score_spread":0.3139886198361295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}