{"id":"W2754410234","doi":"10.1111/geb.12630","title":"The spatial scale of time‐lagged population synchrony increases with species dispersal distance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Breeding bird survey; Population; Spatial ecology; Ecology; Population density; Mark and recapture; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Scale (ratio); Density dependence; Population size; Geography; Demography; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001147401,0.0001077677,0.0001567949,0.000009389977,0.001347681,0.00002521363,0.0002010307,0.00007945007,0.0001771572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002774978,0.000064855,0.00004855944,0.00006176177,0.002662587,0.0001023828,0.0002010422,0.00005299683,0.00001862501],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002353777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004317554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004087601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07478724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993399,0.00004019963,0.0001194805,0.0002032458,0.00009197017,0.000205185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995653,0.00004567376,0.0001536444,0.0001843034,0.000009748141,0.00004134253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001783275,0.00007052795,0.9973472,0.000001991734,0.00002659507,0.000003711291,0.00001105668,0.000001282281,0.00008185356,0.0003280698,0.0002201967,0.001729171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000252933,0.000303884,0.9982886,0.00000465061,0.00005580877,0.000007123471,0.00005414981,0.0000186393,0.00003107473,0.0003120235,0.0005825124,0.0000886129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958664,0.0001045768,0.00001737795,0.0003443521,0.00006742001,0.0001252061,0.00007292005,0.00001279643,0.003389006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996699,0.000120565,0.00007552499,0.00003521081,0.00001823295,0.00000958775,0.00000810149,0.000002187831,0.00006065911],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07069963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0036093970397059,"score_gpt":0.2062496217349016,"score_spread":0.2026402246951957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}