{"id":"W2755058106","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2017.08.013","title":"“Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in radiation oncology: A systematic review”","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Cancer Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Dalhousie University; McMaster University; BC Cancer Agency","funders":"BC Cancer Agency","keywords":"Systematic review; Medicine; Critical appraisal; Meta-analysis; Protocol (science); Inclusion and exclusion criteria; Guideline; MEDLINE; Medical physics; Publication bias; Quality (philosophy); Quality Score; Randomized controlled trial; Alternative medicine; Internal medicine; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4128046,0.004422848,0.02032501,0.01942928,0.002208943,0.0104106,0.00686345,0.009760695,0.00199613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.784811,0.00580653,0.0323816,0.01349682,0.008728593,0.01107008,0.01083866,0.007717643,0.0004986742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0107973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03615863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009892168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02170692,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3805027,0.389098,0.1722239,0.01147998,0.04484769,0.001847848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2195271,0.6348525,0.08639167,0.01901181,0.03857242,0.001644556],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001392007,0.00005299173,0.005616627,0.6709806,0.1960708,0.0001717653,0.001117885,0.0008135175,0.0005432147,0.002970546,0.01194574,0.1083242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002529606,0.0005707407,0.01006306,0.5330089,0.4143026,0.0006124935,0.000463384,0.001030671,0.00123329,0.01270919,0.02303555,0.0004405176],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001698392,0.9792669,0.005694368,0.008332289,0.002514537,0.001620597,0.000506323,0.00007235701,0.0002942897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09599727,0.7984387,0.0702302,0.02086604,0.005072922,0.007604392,0.001187452,0.0001968985,0.0004059933],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.979675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7241164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9922369730442526,"score_gpt":0.8053335287541262,"score_spread":0.1869034442901264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}