{"id":"W2755058106","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2017.08.013","title":"“Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in radiation oncology: A systematic review”","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Cancer Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Dalhousie University; McMaster University; BC Cancer Agency","funders":"BC Cancer Agency","keywords":"Systematic review; Medicine; Critical appraisal; Meta-analysis; Protocol (science); Inclusion and exclusion criteria; Guideline; MEDLINE; Medical physics; Publication bias; Quality (philosophy); Quality Score; Randomized controlled trial; Alternative medicine; Internal medicine; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.86388,0.001290965,0.1423458,0.0007137988,0.0002699082,0.0002690016,0.009425323,0.001131111,0.001369918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9087768,0.0004227335,0.01538138,0.00170517,0.0005301548,0.0003363292,0.0005187507,0.001365451,0.001408857],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007538228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000956159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001033844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009808457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1356915,0.7494085,0.1087009,0.002654637,0.002710487,0.0008338934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2047686,0.5257112,0.2470417,0.02061334,0.001560982,0.0003042153],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[7.755381e-7,0.00002346169,0.00009801242,0.8846939,0.0005057166,0.000002784843,0.00005641187,0.000002469515,3.385503e-8,0.0009434153,0.0118172,0.1018558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005250839,0.00001769364,0.00003371826,0.5829238,0.006986553,0.00002724737,0.00005367174,0.00007246254,7.057297e-9,0.001385822,0.4081991,0.0002474722],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[5.471828e-7,0.9687546,0.004522324,0.00130169,0.001302789,0.02330554,0.00003726882,0.000006808611,0.0007684391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000003616702,0.9824978,0.002259328,0.001571406,0.0002187461,0.01203139,0.00002978973,0.00003376511,0.001354158],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3963819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9922369730442526,"score_gpt":0.8053335287541262,"score_spread":0.1869034442901264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}