{"id":"W2755503997","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2017-0093","title":"A Lagrangian approach to model movement of migratory species","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Semelparity and iteroparity; Lagrangian; Computer science; Range (aeronautics); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Econometrics; Ecology; Fishery; Mathematics; Biology; Life history; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005839023,0.0006458979,0.0004665149,0.0006270832,0.0004837628,0.0008379738,0.001669376,0.0009598992,0.003068425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001803829,0.0004219375,0.0009632165,0.0007797278,0.0006045705,0.001098188,0.001138848,0.00123997,0.0008005045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007373189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001185621,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01324866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008468486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997763,0.00008074426,0.00001951765,0.00004441238,0.00005134357,0.00002768486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995841,0.0001548944,0.0001131325,0.00003978437,0.00006223081,0.0000458632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001041035,0.00002781965,0.001888962,0.00004293639,0.0000372091,0.0001443776,0.0001034451,0.8325042,0.0008948764,0.1494076,0.00344044,0.01149772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001005751,0.00001857867,0.0002298302,0.00001139117,0.000009585578,0.00004598024,0.00001703997,0.967609,0.00007587826,0.02529046,0.006668721,0.00001352794],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005847501,0.0002131203,0.9859476,0.0005833649,0.0000732258,0.00003382772,0.0003871634,0.0001435966,0.006770575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4045066,0.001516146,0.5560539,0.000526549,0.0003565705,0.0007740079,0.001503027,0.0003394681,0.03442363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01324866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02634305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02716415451054345,"score_gpt":0.2096937571133356,"score_spread":0.1825296026027921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}