{"id":"W2755810673","doi":"10.1177/0021998317732139","title":"Effect of iron oxide nanoparticle size on electromagnetic properties of composite nanofibers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Composite Materials","topic":"Electromagnetic wave absorption materials","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development","keywords":"Materials science; Nanofiber; Nanocomposite; Composite material; Composite number; Carbon nanofiber; Scanning electron microscope; Superparamagnetism; Nanoparticle; Raman spectroscopy; Electrospinning; Magnetite; Electromagnetic shielding; Carbon nanotube; Nanotechnology; Magnetization; Magnetic field; Polymer; Optics; Metallurgy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002628829,0.0003640401,0.001389614,0.0001597962,0.0002254225,0.0003262261,0.001081441,0.000126314,0.0004725988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003626905,0.0002665134,0.0002015968,0.00007193589,0.0004374641,0.0004212132,0.0001754319,0.0001027172,0.00006191693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007583528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008125319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008263558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000133823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957294,0.0009950448,0.001728708,0.0002721887,0.000787913,0.0004867851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995161,0.0003292305,0.003214383,0.0007925908,0.0003529593,0.0001498683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004481539,0.0001764578,0.0002231801,0.000436326,0.00004376433,0.00002280878,0.0001254228,0.00005694365,0.9941846,0.00007591712,0.00008673996,0.00008634756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002107479,0.007689595,0.00772291,0.0007215292,0.0001886679,0.0001150774,0.000006055566,0.000003556903,0.9810588,0.0001289449,0.00002276602,0.0002345603],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978701,0.0002774272,0.000003286899,0.0002470535,0.0009814058,0.000426935,0.0000300829,0.00002369746,0.0001400409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981543,0.00005104964,0.001407392,0.00005025633,0.0001716454,0.000008953708,0.000001189663,0.00004498205,0.0001102279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0131257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009337578020267323,"score_gpt":0.2456473427946367,"score_spread":0.2363097647743694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}