{"id":"W2755810673","doi":"10.1177/0021998317732139","title":"Effect of iron oxide nanoparticle size on electromagnetic properties of composite nanofibers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Composite Materials","topic":"Electromagnetic wave absorption materials","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development","keywords":"Materials science; Nanofiber; Nanocomposite; Composite material; Composite number; Carbon nanofiber; Scanning electron microscope; Superparamagnetism; Nanoparticle; Raman spectroscopy; Electrospinning; Magnetite; Electromagnetic shielding; Carbon nanotube; Nanotechnology; Magnetization; Magnetic field; Polymer; Optics; Metallurgy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002869444,0.0003251679,0.000159282,0.0002219048,0.0001492945,0.0002096593,0.0001261199,0.0002228959,0.0008331045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006846074,0.0001989641,0.0001379175,0.00008732046,0.0001629331,0.0002830458,0.0001008558,0.000189862,0.0001342532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001604292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001031903,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003861098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007557379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998636,0.00002025372,0.00001269977,0.00004424545,0.00003469926,0.0000243708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993306,0.0003615942,0.0001178809,0.00003048786,0.00008752917,0.00007176714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009274124,0.00001897478,0.00009942806,0.00002315296,0.000003670465,0.00002351591,0.0000140962,0.00009830746,0.9990028,0.00001752578,0.00001032142,0.0005954654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006445537,0.0001445316,0.001505913,0.000002117702,0.000009267739,0.00002818696,0.000006835076,0.0004986348,0.9976426,0.000007268728,0.000145299,0.000002910617],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978939,0.0002877852,0.0008571472,0.0000199963,0.00001317402,0.00000974696,0.00004586466,0.0000330996,0.0008393548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977913,0.0001773076,0.001415651,0.00001854306,0.000008311385,0.00001669494,0.00005975273,0.00002125283,0.0004910904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0008331045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002786994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009337578020267323,"score_gpt":0.2456473427946367,"score_spread":0.2363097647743694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}