{"id":"W2756054052","doi":"10.1016/j.carbon.2017.09.015","title":"Atomistic simulations of nanoscale crack-vacancy interaction in graphene","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carbon","topic":"Graphene research and applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Western Canada Research Grid","keywords":"Materials science; Vacancy defect; Nanoscopic scale; Crack closure; Molecular dynamics; Fracture mechanics; Composite material; Ultimate tensile strength; Crack tip opening displacement; Crack growth resistance curve; Graphene; Stress field; Mechanics; Structural engineering; Condensed matter physics; Nanotechnology; Finite element method; Chemistry; Physics; Computational chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001134175,0.00005255044,0.0000981897,0.00008382304,0.000112979,0.00003889022,0.0002227576,0.00002725687,0.00006577485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001844426,0.00005074511,0.00003022349,0.00008663497,0.0001016157,0.0001298478,0.00004982019,0.00005989723,0.00001123606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002301117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003392447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000797028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003995352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994092,0.00002696737,0.0001563222,0.0001432782,0.0001206985,0.0001435312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992968,0.00006131927,0.0001068102,0.0004237489,0.00006163152,0.00004972679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001690163,0.00006769955,0.01751462,0.000018117,0.000002066297,0.000001201719,0.00006388707,0.0001856275,0.9788967,0.002582608,0.00002358219,0.0006269948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006305077,0.00005393157,0.3507687,0.00009662515,0.0000114169,0.000001577993,0.00006552832,0.008911506,0.6226027,0.01632966,0.0003698716,0.0001579612],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957686,0.00002866527,0.0001125973,0.0001625224,0.0001018596,0.000146208,0.00001677311,0.00001336936,0.003649383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999713,0.00001453902,0.0001380667,0.000004943497,0.00003027892,0.00002960335,0.00000430646,0.00000549207,0.00005974936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.356294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2069326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03083978238399842,"score_gpt":0.3349389469766847,"score_spread":0.3040991645926863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}