{"id":"W2756595302","doi":"10.1386/aps.2.1-3.9_1","title":"Charting public art – a quantitative and qualitative approach to understanding sustainable social influences of art in the public realm","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Art & the Public Sphere","topic":"Public Spaces through Art","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Emily Carr University of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Cornerstone; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Sustainable development; Discipline; Urban design; Sociology; Public relations; Urban planning; Environmental ethics; Social science; Geography; Engineering; Law; Civil engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01528899,0.000299644,0.0004562492,0.0002794712,0.001962993,0.00108928,0.001155845,0.0001786675,0.0002460801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005027549,0.0002095299,0.0001249043,0.003435139,0.001571559,0.004246359,0.0003720931,0.0004569446,0.0001637432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005502086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007078113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006712151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006390356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930319,0.002813273,0.0006096212,0.0004637501,0.001222794,0.001858685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965961,0.001810555,0.0004543144,0.0004191679,0.0003653603,0.0003545247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001019358,0.0001615463,0.005565614,0.00001788669,0.00005404251,9.320965e-7,0.2814059,7.627752e-7,0.000007938972,0.6737612,0.03884722,0.0001667593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002339487,0.00004562384,0.001929811,0.00001071283,0.00001300198,0.0000040437,0.6203645,0.00003145351,0.000001907849,0.01315154,0.3640182,0.0001952643],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1941972,0.0004587277,0.002117444,0.2764233,0.0002653349,0.001705897,0.00001555419,0.0001407932,0.5246757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925885,0.00003327318,0.0006212667,0.001425881,0.0002617321,0.0002706947,0.00001751265,0.00002986003,0.004751288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7983913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1799629284300593,"score_gpt":0.3957412658645873,"score_spread":0.215778337434528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}