{"id":"W2756603975","doi":"10.1177/0272989x17732990","title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Childhood Health Utilities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Medical Decision Making","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"University of Warwick; Economic and Social Research Council; National Institute for Health and Care Research; Advantage West Midlands","keywords":"EconLit; PsycINFO; Respondent; CINAHL; Medicine; Systematic review; Health economics; Economic evaluation; Valuation (finance); MEDLINE; Cost–utility analysis; Population; Meta-analysis; Actuarial science; Cochrane Library; Public health; Psychological intervention; Cost effectiveness; Environmental health; Nursing; Economics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07156291,0.0005356305,0.03269382,0.001339872,0.0002828898,0.0001243521,0.001182563,0.0004449735,0.003208853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06347053,0.0004373571,0.003533038,0.0005615896,0.0001640467,0.0002012003,0.000314926,0.0004950745,0.0003753755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003083499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006961132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001224168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008395052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9790195,0.001846128,0.01709158,0.001020194,0.000566834,0.0004557523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701248,0.008816068,0.01844296,0.002108732,0.00008967859,0.0004177639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[3.703186e-7,0.00004215823,0.000002072531,0.9152216,0.05773669,0.000001972629,0.0001679365,3.004131e-7,4.91672e-12,0.007153026,0.003016375,0.01665755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001297362,0.00004881434,0.00002048535,0.336124,0.315258,0.00003384035,0.00006090133,0.0001986216,1.804084e-10,0.002962459,0.3446398,0.0005233818],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[2.116566e-7,0.9881821,0.003148278,0.004158179,0.0001808395,0.002878163,0.0009760835,0.00002513978,0.000450952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00001567463,0.9876227,0.00129386,0.01017568,0.00006232203,0.0004363553,0.00005998735,0.00004876344,0.0002846981],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5790976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7321214391074573,"score_gpt":0.5889026381639694,"score_spread":0.1432188009434879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}