{"id":"W2756603975","doi":"10.1177/0272989x17732990","title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Childhood Health Utilities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Medical Decision Making","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"University of Warwick; Economic and Social Research Council; National Institute for Health and Care Research; Advantage West Midlands","keywords":"EconLit; PsycINFO; Respondent; CINAHL; Medicine; Systematic review; Health economics; Economic evaluation; Valuation (finance); MEDLINE; Cost–utility analysis; Population; Meta-analysis; Actuarial science; Cochrane Library; Public health; Psychological intervention; Cost effectiveness; Environmental health; Nursing; Economics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03796222,0.003809549,0.02096269,0.01522324,0.0008746551,0.004810882,0.002388003,0.002318037,0.004568004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1006368,0.001618924,0.04698956,0.01215435,0.001032827,0.003072932,0.002490682,0.002730086,0.0003488531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005679575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008856747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00652503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01326533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9582634,0.02583152,0.008814012,0.002472022,0.003849888,0.0007691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9451499,0.04269097,0.006596126,0.00175153,0.003479194,0.0003323125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001152873,0.00002723907,0.002266793,0.5514169,0.4235356,0.0001117704,0.00008536895,0.0006817754,0.0001006966,0.0003417459,0.0009091327,0.01936998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007127199,0.0002889331,0.003285123,0.1012051,0.8900028,0.0001570361,0.00006479262,0.0003250044,0.0001273181,0.0006413172,0.003156829,0.00003309684],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002023687,0.9947401,0.001016651,0.000231855,0.0001618269,0.0007318974,0.0007514292,0.00002601967,0.0003165078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1013909,0.885999,0.005944782,0.0009181201,0.0003145134,0.003705978,0.00140364,0.00003841968,0.0002847012],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03796222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2007658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7321214391074573,"score_gpt":0.5889026381639694,"score_spread":0.1432188009434879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}